Legal Opinion

Reuter v. City of New Hope

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 2, 1990No. C0-89-1337PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Officers Roxanne Erickson and Lowell Campbell appeal from a denial of their summary judgment motion claiming qualified immunity and official immunity from civil suit arising out of an emergency medical admission.

FACTS

On November 11, 1985, Wendelyn Reuter drove her husband David Reuter to perform a reupholstering bid at a home in New Hope, Minnesota. The couple’s two daughters were with them. Wendelyn Reuter parked the family’s Toyota sedan in front of the home where David Reuter was performing the reupholstering bid. David went inside and left Wendelyn Reuter and the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Sok Kong v. City of BurnsvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  2. Gleason v. Metropolitan Council Transit OperationsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Maras v. City of BrainerdCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Soucek v. BanhamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Semler v. KlangCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API