Legal Opinion
Commercial Ins. Co. of Newark v. Copeland
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 15, 1967No. Civ. 29344PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJefferson, J.
The plaintiff insurance company brought an action, seeking a declaration that all claims against it under the uninsured motorist coverage provided in a policy issued by plaintiff to defendants Dorothy and James Copeland, have been settled by a binding release executed by defendants; and for a permanent injunction restraining defendants from proceeding with the arbitration of these claims. The case was submitted to the court on the depositions of defendants, two doctors, an insurance agent and an insurance adjuster; plus certain medical records and documents signed by defendants which related…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Casey v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Sawday v. Vista Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Fisher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Loscalzo v. Federal Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
3Cited by18 opinions
- Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Campbell v. Farmers Ins. Exch.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Allstate Insurance v. ShmitkaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Gunderson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. RuizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.