State v. Sandoval

ANDERSON, PJ.

¶ 1. Juan Sandoval argues that he is entitled to a new trial because he believes his trial attorney provided ineffective assistance by failing to argue the proper basis for excluding the State's rebuttal witness and by failing to impeach the witness with his prior inconsistent statements. For the reasons discussed, Sandoval's request is denied and we affirm the trial court.

¶ 2. Sandoval was charged with attempted first-degree intentional homicide while armed, substantial battery while armed, and intentionally pointing a firearm at another person. The charges arose from an…