Legal Opinion
Brymer v. Town of Clinton
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 22, 2011No. SC 18202PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
The plaintiff, John Brymer III, appeals 1 from the decision of the compensation review board (board), which affirmed the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner for the third district (commissioner) dismissing the plaintiffs claim for hypertension benefits under General Statutes § 7-433c (a) 2 as untimely under the one year limitation period of General Statutes § 31-294c (a). 3 In particular, the plaintiff claims that the board improperly upheld the commissioner’s determination that the plaintiff had notice of his hypertension more than one year before he filed his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tracy v. Scherwitzky Gutter Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Ciarlelli v. TOWN OF HAMDENSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Stevenson Lumber Company-Suffield, Inc. v. Chase Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- D'Amico v. Department of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Fadner v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
3Cited by4 opinions
- 418 Meadow St. Assoc. v. Clean Air PartnersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- O'Connor v. Med-Center Home Health Care, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Conroy v. StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- Wabno v. City of DerbyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012