Cinquanta v. Burdett
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pringle
We will refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court where plaintiff in error was the plaintiff and defendant in error was the defendant.
In his complaint the plaintiff alleged that the defendant had uttered slanderous statements concerning him and that said statements amounted to slander per se.
The specific words complained of are as follows: “I don’t like doing business with crooks. You’re a dead beat. You’ve owed me $155.00 for three or four months. You’re crooks.”
No special damages were proved and the trial court, holding that as a matter of law the words spoken did not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Diener v. Star-Chronicle Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- Yakavicze v. ValentukeviciousSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Bennett v. SeimillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
- Villemin v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Nelson v. RosenbergNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Barlow v. International Harvester CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- French v. Jadon, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Branda v. SanfordNevada Supreme Court · 1981
- Siercke v. SierckeIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
- Sunward Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.