Legal Opinion

Barry v. Kirkland

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1948No. 32446PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.

This is an action at law whereby the plaintiff seeks to recover damages based on acts and spoken words by the defendant in a public auditorium at a public forum in the city of Omaha, Nebraska, and his acts in connection with a broadcast of said words spoken at the public meeting. The only question before this court is that of whether or not the petition states a cause of action.

The portion of the petition necessary to be examined in order to determine whether or not it states a cause of action, is as follows: Plaintiff’s petition alleges that he is engaged in the business of selling books,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sorensen v. WoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  2. World Publishing Co. v. MullenNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Williams v. FullerNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Nelson v. RosenbergNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Dalton v. WoodwardNebraska Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. The Curtis Publishing Company v. Colonel T. B. BirdsongCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  2. Tennyson v. WerthmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Rhodes v. Star Herald Printing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Hennis v. O'CONNORNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. K CORP. v. StewartNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API