Legal Opinion
City of San Jose v. Sharma
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 3, 2016No. C074539PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, Acting P. J.
This dispute is over who is entitled to real property “tax increment” revenue after the statutory dissolution of the San Jose Redevelopment Agency. The trial court held that tax increment revenue from a real property tax imposed to raise funds for the pension obligations of Santa Clara County is properly distributed to the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund to pay the debts of the former redevelopment agency. Santa Clara County, with its Director of Finance Vinod K. Sharma, contends on appeal that this holding was erroneous. The trial court also held that…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
- Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. McCrackenSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Grass Valley v. Cohen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- City of Anaheim v. BoslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- City of Anaheim v. Cohen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- City of Grass Valley v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- City of Grass Valley v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.