City of Anaheim v. Cohen

DUARTE, J., Concurring and Dissenting

After reconsidering and reviewing this matter further in light of the rehearing petition and answer, I now respectfully dissent from Parts II and IV (in part) because I no longer believe the dissolution statutes worked to impair contracts as to the Avon/Dakota revitalization project. I concur in Part III, as to prejudgment interest. Because Part I was not challenged in the rehearing petition, I will concur in the result therein.1

BACKGROUND

On June 22, 2010, the City of Anaheim approved an agreement (dated for identification purposes June 1, 2010), between…