Legal Opinion

State v. Cormier

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 18, 2000No. 18287-8-IIIPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

— Evidence discovered as a result of an unconstitutional Terry stop may generally be excluded. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 14-15, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889 (1968). But a person detained by a police officer, even illegally, may not assault the officer, if the arrest threatens only a loss of freedom. State v. Valentine, 132 Wn.2d 1, 21-22, 935 P.2d 1294 (1997).

Manuel Cormier rode his bicycle by and stared at police executing a search warrant. They stopped him. He refused *459to cooperate and assaulted an officer. Police then arrested him and found drugs. Police had no reason to suspect Mr.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. ArmentaWashington Supreme Court · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. CormierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. State v. BeitoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. State v. LemusCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API