Legal Opinion

State v. Cormier

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 18, 2000No. 18287-8-IIIPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

997 P.2d 950 (2000)

100 Wash.App. 457

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Manuel R. CORMIER, Appellant.

No. 18287-8-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Four.

April 18, 2000.

Reconsideration Denied May 24, 2000.

David N. Gasch, Spokane, for Appellant.

Kevin M. Korsmo, Andrew J. Metts, III, Deputy Prosecuting Attorneys, Spokane, for Respondent.

SWEENEY, A.C.J.

Evidence discovered as a result of an unconstitutional Terry stop may generally be excluded. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 14-15, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). But a person detained by a police officer, even illegally, may not…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. BeitoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. State v. LemusCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. State v. CerrilloCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API