Legal Opinion

State v. Adams

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 17, 2008No. 25969-2-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

¶1 One of the “jealously guarded” exceptions to the general requirement of a search warrant is the protective frisk. In State v. Horrace,1 our state Supreme Court ruled that following the arrest of a driver, a passenger may be frisked if an officer has specific, articulable facts *102supporting a reasonable belief that the passenger may be armed and dangerous. Here, a passenger in a stolen car was frisked for merely being in the car at the time of the stop. The question is whether the officer had reasonable, articulable facts that led him to believe that the passenger was armed and/or dangerous…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. FloresWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. State of Washington v. Cody Ray FloresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. State v. FloresWashington Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API