Borden v. Carolina Power & Light Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Stacy, J., at January Special Term, 1917, of Lee.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
This is an action to recover damages by reason of tbe •defendant’s dam at Buckhorn backing water upon the plaintiff’s land. The plaintiffs contend that their lands have been thus damaged, while the defendant contends that whatever damage, if any, the plaintiffs sustained was not due to defendant’s dam, but to natural causes and the negligence of the plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs’ land lies upon Cape Fear Biver six or seven miles above defendant’s dam. It has been subject to overflow from time immemorial. It is admitted that the greatest overflow which has occurred in the memory of men now living…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brown v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- State v. TysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Roberts v. . BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Lockville Power Corp. v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Waters v. . KearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- R. R. v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- York v. YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- MacKay v. BreezeUtah Supreme Court · 1928
- York v. . YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938