Legal Opinion

Lockville Power Corp. v. Carolina Power & Light Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 3, 1915PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Connor, J., at August Term, 1914, of Chatham:.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

This was an action to recover damages by reason of the

defendant’s dam backing water on the plaintiff’s land and water power at Rockville. The jury found that the plaintiff was tbe owner of the land and water power and that the defendant’s Buckhorn dam wrongfully ponded water within 200 feet of,the plaintiff’s mill site at Rockville, and awarded damages therefor.

The defendant’s main contention was the insufficient execution and probate of two deeds offered in evidence by the plaintiff. One deed was from the Deep River Manufacturing Company to the> American Iron and Steel Company, 15 July,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Aycock v. Raleigh & Augusta Air-Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  2. Quinnerly v. . QuinnerlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  3. A. T. Bruce & Co. v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  4. Barcello v. . HapgoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Mayho and Parker v. . CottonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bailey v. . HassellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Freeman v. . MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. McClure v. . CrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Manufacturers' Finance Co. v. Amazon Cotton Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Brown v. . RuffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API