Legal Opinion · Dissent

York v. . York

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1938Published

1DissentBarnhill, J.

STACY, C. J., and WINBORNE. J., concur in dissent. This is an action for actionable negligence brought by plaintiff against defendant to recover damages. The defendant denied negligence and set up the plea of contributory negligence. The plaintiff and defendant are husband and wife, have been married to each other for 34 years and have five children.

The defendant had an engagement in Charlotte, N.C. on 3 June, 1935, about 12:30 p.m., to have a contract signed, and left Raleigh about 9 o'clock — about a half hour late — in his car taking the plaintiff, his wife, who was riding with him on the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Harton v. . Telephone Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. White v. Carolina Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Rawls v. . LuptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Albritton v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Shirley v. . AyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API