Legal Opinion
Scherr v. Difco Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 2, 1967No. Civ. No. 25532PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THORNTON, District Judge.
This action is one for specific performance of a license agreement, for an accounting and for damages. Jurisdiction rests on diversity of citizenship and presence of an amount in controversy in excess of $10,000. We append hereto • a copy of said License Agreement which was entered into on July 1, 1959. Under the terms set forth therein defendant was granted a non-exclusive license under plaintiff’s United States Reissue Patent No. 24557 and Canadian Patent No. 578,055, “to make, use and sell the licensed products” in Canada and the United States. (License…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Drackett Chemical Co. v. Chamberlain Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- Lucille B. Woodbury, of the Estate of Ray B. Woodbury, Deceased v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Scherr v. National Bio-Test, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1961
- George H. Scherr, an Individual v. National Bio-Test, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
3Cited by1 opinion
- George H. Scherr v. Difco Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968