Legal Opinion
George H. Scherr v. Difco Laboratories, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 3, 1968No. 18004_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judge.
This diversity action was brought to recover royalty payments allegedly due under a patent licensing agreement. Scherr, Plaintiff-Appellee, granted a nonexclusive license under United States Patent 24,557 to Difco Laboratories, Inc., Defendant-Appellant, to make, use, and sell a certain licensed product. When Difco failed to pay the royalties specified in the agreement or to account for sales of the licensed product as provided in the agreement, Scherr brought this action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan for specific…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Brulotte v. Thys Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Triplett v. LowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Zenith Laboratories, Inc., on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carter-Wallace, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- The Troxel Manufacturing Company, & Cross-Appellant v. Schwinn Bicycle Company, & Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Robert Boggild & William Dale v. Kenner Products, Division of Cpg Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Sybron Transition Corp. v. NIXON, HARGRAVEDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1991
- Troxel Manufacturing Co. v. Schwinn Bicycle Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.