Legal Opinion
Lick Mill Creek Apartments v. Chicago Title Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 17, 1991No. H006961PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AGLIANO, P. J.
Plaintiffs Lick Mill Creek Apartments and Prometheus Development Company, Inc., appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained, without leave to amend, the demurrer of defendants Chicago Title Insurance Company and First American Title Insurance Company to plaintiffs’ first amended complaint. The trial court determined, based on undisputed facts alleged in the complaint, that title insurance policies issued by defendants did not provide coverage for the costs of removing hazardous substances from plaintiffs’ property. For the reasons stated…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Delgado v. Heritage Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Aerojet-General Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Insurance of North America v. Sam Harris Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Denny's Restaurants, Inc. v. Security Union Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Dollinger Deanza Associates v. Chicago Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Elysian Investment Group, LLC v. Stewart Title Guaranty CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Bear Fritz Land Co. v. Kachemak Bay Title Agency, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
- First United, Inc. v. Chicago Title InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.