Legal Opinion

Bear Fritz Land Co. v. Kachemak Bay Title Agency, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1996No. S-6992PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In 1984 Robert Cooper and Virginia Cooper owned a parcel of property in Homer known as Fritz Subdivision, Unit 2. While the Coopers were making improvements on the parcel, a representative of the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) inspected the site and ordered the Coopers to stop construction. The Corps believed the parcel included wetlands which the Coopers needed a permit to fill.

The Coopers applied for a wetlands permit in October 1984. On April 28, 1985, the Corps sent the Coopers copies of a proposed permit which allowed them to fill…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Somerset Savings Bank v. Chicago Title InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Hocking v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Hebb v. SeversonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Jarvis v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sonnett v. First American Title Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  2. New England Federal Credit Union v. Stewart Title Guarantee Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  3. Fidelity National Title Insurance v. Woody Creek Ventures, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  4. Favero Farms v. BaughCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  5. George M. Sonnett, Jr. and Wendy Z. Burgers Sonnett, Husband and Wife v. First American Title Insurance Company, a California Corporation, and First American Title Insurance Company of Sublette County, a Wyoming CorporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API