Legal Opinion

Droppers v. Hand

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed May 10, 1932:

Wickhem, J.

Defendant’s first contention is that plaintiffs are not entitled to the relief of specific performance because their own neglect to cause a satisfaction and discharge of a $4,000 incumbrance upon their property caused the defendant to lose the opportunity of a loan upon the same property, which was necessary to enable her to pay for the property.

It is not necessary to determine whether the proposition as stated by the defendant is literally sound. We have concluded, however, that under all of the facts and circumstances in this case,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hall v. DelaplaineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Buntrock v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Mulligan v. AlbertzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Woldenberg v. RiphanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Hermansen v. SlatterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Zuelke v. GergoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Barr v. GranahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Fullerton v. McGowanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  4. Hoffmann v. DanielsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Pelikan v. SpheerisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API