Hoffmann v. Danielson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The result sought by appellant is rescission of the contract of July 23, 1946; set forth in the statement of facts. Before a party not in default may be entitled to.the relief of rescission, there must be so serious a breach of the contract by the other party'as to destroy the essential objects of the contract. 17 C. J. S., Contracts, p. 906, sec. 422; 12 Am. Jur., Contracts, p. 1020, sec. 440. The breach alleged here is the respondent’s failure to have the house ready for occupancy on October 1, 1946. Whether such a breach would justify rescission would depend on.whether time were of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Buntrock v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Bernard v. JenningsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Droppers v. HandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Boardman v. CourteenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by9 opinions
- Appleton State Bank v. LeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Zuelke v. GergoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- Schiller v. Keuffel & Esser Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Long Investment Co. v. O'DONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Clear View Estates, Inc. v. VeitchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.