Legal Opinion

Hoffmann v. Danielson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1947PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The result sought by appellant is rescission of the contract of July 23, 1946; set forth in the statement of facts. Before a party not in default may be entitled to.the relief of rescission, there must be so serious a breach of the contract by the other party'as to destroy the essential objects of the contract. 17 C. J. S., Contracts, p. 906, sec. 422; 12 Am. Jur., Contracts, p. 1020, sec. 440. The breach alleged here is the respondent’s failure to have the house ready for occupancy on October 1, 1946. Whether such a breach would justify rescission would depend on.whether time were of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buntrock v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Bernard v. JenningsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Droppers v. HandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Boardman v. CourteenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Appleton State Bank v. LeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Zuelke v. GergoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Schiller v. Keuffel & Esser Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Long Investment Co. v. O'DONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Clear View Estates, Inc. v. VeitchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API