Legal Opinion

Raylaine Worsteds, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 5, 1956No. 49550PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaramore, Judge

The plaintiff makes its claim under the War Contract Hardship Claims Act, popularly called the Lucas Act, 60 Stat. 902, 903, as amended by 62 Stat. 992, 41 U. S. C. § 106 note (1952 Ed.), to recover an alleged net loss of $43,238.93 sustained by the plaintiff in the performance of Government contracts between September 16, 1940, and August 14, 1945.

During the above period, the plaintiff, a corporation engaged in the operation of a mill at Manchester, New Hampshire, performed under 12 contracts with the Army Quartermaster Corps. Sis of the contracts, entered into between June 19, 1940, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fogarty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Star Bottling Co. v. Louisiana Purchase Exposition Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  3. Whitfield v. SearsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Samuel T. Gindes and Joan L. Gindes v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Design & Production, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  3. Department of Natural Resources & Conservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  4. Ulmet v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  5. Denton v. EllisDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API