Legal Opinion

Whitfield v. Sears

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 27, 1943No. 46290PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This ease has been before us on a former appeal from a ruling sustaining defendants’, motion to dismiss plaintiff’s amended and substituted petition as amended. Whitfield v. Grimes, 229 Iowa 309, 294 N. W. 346. There has been no change of plaintiff's pleadings since that appeal except for an amendment substituting successor supervisors as defendants. (Throughout this opinion when we refer to “defendants” the term will include, where the context requires, not merely the present defendants but also their predecessors in office.)

Upon remand defendants filed answer in three divisions designed to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hartz v. TruckenmillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  2. Kuhns v. Live Stock National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Whitfield v. GrimesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. Hall v. City of ShenandoahSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Western Bohemian Fraternal Ass'n v. BarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lawson v. FordyceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  2. Raylaine Worsteds, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  3. Ames v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  4. Deming v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  5. Danielson v. ClineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API