Enea v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUSHING, P. J.
Plaintiff Benny Enea brought this petition to set aside an order of respondent court summarily adjudicating his cause of action against his former partners, defendants William Daniels and Claudia Daniels, for breaches of fiduciary duties consisting primarily of renting partnership property to themselves at less than its fair market value. The trial court ruled that, as a matter of law, no such claim could be predicated on such conduct in the absence of an agreement requiring fair market rents. We hold that this was error; the fiduciary duties imposed on partners by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Leff v. GunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Holmes v. LernerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Jones v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Everest Investors 8 v. Whitehall Real Estate Limited Partnership XICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- O'GRADY v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- D'Elia v. Rice Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2006
- Agam v. GavraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Second Measure, Inc. v. KimDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Feresi v. The Livery, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.