Feresi v. The Livery, LLC
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BURKE, J. *
The California Uniform Commercial Code 1 provides that “a financing statement must be filed to perfect all security interests ... .” (§ 9310, subd. (a).) It further provides, “A perfected security interest . . . has priority over a conflicting unperfected security interest . . . .” (§ 9322, subd. (a)(2).) This order of priority is not immutable and in some circumstances must yield to principles of equity. Here two parties hold security interests in the same entity. One party perfected his security interest by breaching a fiduciary duty owed to the party whose security…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Citizens Business Bank v. GevorgianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Knox v. Phoenix Leasing Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- General Insurance Company of America v. Edward F. Lowry and Kusworm & Myers Co., L. P. A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Eleanor Licensing LLC v. Classic Recreations LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Center Healthcare Ed. & Res. v. Internat. Cong. Joint Reconst.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Eleanor Licensing LLC v. Classic Recreations LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Law Offices of Gary Kurtz v. Markowitz CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Singh v. Molnar CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.