Everest Investors 8 v. Whitehall Real Estate Limited Partnership XI
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (MIRIAM A.), J.
The question on this appeal is whether a nonfiduciary defendant can be liable for conspiring with a fiduciary defendant to breach the fiduciary’s duty to the plaintiff. The answer, in our view, is sometimes yes and sometimes no. When the nonfiduciary is an agent or employee of the fiduciary, the nonfiduciary is entitled to the benefit of the “agent’s immunity rule” (and thus not liable on a conspiracy theory) unless the nonfiduciary was acting for its own benefit. If the nonfiduciary is neither an employee nor agent of the fiduciary, it is not liable to the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- City of Atascadero v. Merill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Hendy v. LosseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- American Master Lease LLC v. Idanta Partners, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- 1-800 CONTACTS, INC. v. SteinbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Shafer v. Berger, Kahn, Shafton, Moss, Figler, Simon & GladstoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Champlaie v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.