Jones v. Wells Fargo Bank
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, J.
Plaintiff Michael Jones appeals from a judgment of dismissal following the sustaining of a demurrer in a suit involving a shared appreciation loan made to a partnership of which he is a limited partner. Jones alleged that the loan and a later forbearance agreement were usurious, unconscionable, and unfair, and that arranging them breached defendants’ fiduciary duty to the partnership and its limited partners. The trial court sustained the defendants’ demurrer to all causes of action, without leave to amend. We find no error in the trial court’s ruling. We affirm the judgment.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Graham v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Morris v. Redwood Empire BancorpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Parada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Roman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.