Legal Opinion

City of Ottawa v. Lester

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 27, 1991No. 66,614PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gernon, J.:

Steven L. Lester appeals from the district court’s ruling affirming the municipal court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The basis of Lester’s motion was his claim that the municipal court misinformed him concerning the consequences of entering a plea. We affirm.

We must first consider whether Lester’s appeal should be dismissed as moot.

Our appellate decisions have addressed the doctrine of mootness on many occasions. “ ‘[I]t is the duty of the courts to decide actual controversies by a judgment which can be carried into effect, and not to give opinions upon moot…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Henry Edsel Holmes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Douglas Fruchtman v. Frank Kenton, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. Andrew JordanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. State v. BartonWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. United States v. Joseph T. BouthotCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. MoodySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. State v. MuriithiSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. State v. LaMunyonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  5. Dickerson v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API