Legal Opinion

State v. Hughes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 9, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtClakksoN, J.

There was no exception to tbe charge of tbe court below, tbe exclusion of evidence on tbe trial in tbe court below is tbe bone of contention. Tbe defendants contend: Tbe real, controlling-question involved in tbis case is: "Whether or not tbe principle laid down in tbe opinion in tbe case of State v. Goffney, 157 N. C., 624, applies to tbe facts of tbis case. We think tbe facts in tbis case differ materially from tbe Goffney case, as will be hereafter shown.

Tbe defendants are charged with tbe burglary of tbe Spruce Pine Store Company, Inc. Tbe defendant Tom Hughes admitted going into tbe…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Gazzam v. German Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. United States v. WhittierU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1878
  4. Miles F. Bixler Co. v. BrittonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. State v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API