Legal Opinion

Mason v. Town of Andrews

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 9, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

It .may be noted that no time'is specified in tbe contract when tbe work should be completed. To be sure tbe contract was to make a complete audit of tbe books of tbe town, but this must be done within a reasonable time. If this was not so, where no time is mentioned, a party who is employed to do certain work, may take an unlimited time — such is not tbe law.

13 C. J., p. 685, sec. 782, says: “Tbe question as to what is a reasonable time for tbe performance of a contract, fixing no time for performance, depends on tbe nature of tbe contract and tbe particular circumstances. In deciding…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holden v. . RoyallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. J. B. Colt Co. v. KimballSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Lambeth v. City of ThomasvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. T. C. May Co. v. Menzies Shoe Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Howie v. . ReaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Durham Lumber Co. v. Wrenn-Wilson Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Etheridge v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Etheridge v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API