Norfolk Southern Railroad v. Albemarle Fertilizer Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
The controversy between the contending parties was as to whether the shipment of the eight cars was a continuous or through freight shipment or a local shipment. Was there legal evidence sufficient to go to the jury that it was a continuous or through freight shipment? The plaintiff contending and producing evidence on the trial and submitting prayers for instructions that it was not a continuous or through shipment, but local and it had performed its special contract and demurrage should be allowed for admitted delay over free time allowed by law, and on all the evidence it should recover,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hazard's Administrator v. New England Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
- Universal Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. BurneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- McDearman v. . MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- T. C. May Co. v. Menzies Shoe Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lester Brothers, Inc. v. JM THOMPSON COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964