Legal Opinion
Hodgson v. KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUT COMPANY
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided August 25, 1972No. Civ. A. C-69-G-68PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MERHIGE, District Judge.
This action is brought by the Secretary of Labor, pursuant to Section 17 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., to enjoin defendant from violating the overtime requirements of the Act, and to restrain continued withholding of unpaid overtime compensation to its driver-salesman employees, and violations of the record-keeping provisions of the Act. Jurisdiction of the Court is attained pursuant to Title 29 U.S.C. § 217.
The rights and privileges of the parties are governed by the Act and regulations promulgated pursuant thereto.
Defendant, upon…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Walling v. General Industries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. The Klages Coal and Ice Company, D/B/A Royal Crown Bottling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Wirtz v. LunsfordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
3Cited by16 opinions
- Olivo v. GMAC Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Florentino Meza v. Intelligent Mexican MarketingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Ackerman v. Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Nielsen v. Devry, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2003
- McLaughlin v. MurphyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.