Legal Opinion
Nielsen v. Devry, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided December 17, 2003No. 4:02-cv-00023PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this action are Stacy L. Nielsen and 173 other past and present employees of Defendant, DeVry, Inc. (“DeVry”). Plaintiffs allege that DeVry denied them overtime compensation for hours routinely worked in excess of 40 per week, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (the “FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. Now before the Court is DeVry’s motion for summary judgment, in which DeVry asserts that Plaintiffs’ claims fail as a matter of law because Plaintiffs fall within the “outside sales” or alternatively the “administrative” exemptions of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Clements v. Serco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Flood v. Just Energy Mktg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Martin v. Sprint United Management Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Amendola v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Hantz v. Prospect Mortgage, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.