Legal Opinion
Wirtz v. Lunsford
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 22, 1968No. Nos. 17745, 17746PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COMBS, Circuit Judge.
These actions were brought by the Secretary of Labor to enjoin the defendants-appellees from violating the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. Lunsford was charged with violating the minimum wage, overtime and record keeping provisions of the Act, and Thomas with violating its overtime, record keeping, and child labor provisions. Both defendants are distributors for Gulf Oil Corporation, Lunsford at Greeneville, Tennessee and Thomas at Johnson City, Tennessee.
Defendants contend that they are not engaged in interstate commerce, and that their employees are…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Standard Oil Co. of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. The Klages Coal and Ice Company, D/B/A Royal Crown Bottling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- California Trucking Ass'n v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Hodgson v. KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUT COMPANYDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1972
- Marshall v. Baptist Hospital, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1979
- Pezzillo v. General Telephone & Electronics Information Systems, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.