Bruggeman v. Illinois Central Railroad
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Mitchell District Court, ITon. C. H. Kelly, Judge. Action for personal injuries resulting from a collision with, one of defendant’s trains on a public highway crossing. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.
The case was before us upon former appeal. See 147 Iowa, 187. Reference may be had to such former opinion for the fact details. As far as is practicable, we will avoid repetition of these herein. The accident under inquiry occured in the unincorporated villiage of Toeterville on the 1st day of December about three o’clock in the afternoon. Defendant’s line of railway runs due east and west and intersects a north and south highway at right angles at a point fifty-seven feet east of its village depot. This highway constitued the only thoroughfare of the village. A few hundred feet west of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bruggeman v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Kinyon v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Reed v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Cordell v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Funston v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1883
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Denton v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Shaw v. Soo Line RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. PerinoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Williams v. Mason City & Fort Dodge Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Missouri K. & T. Ry. Co. v. PerinoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.