Scholfield Gear & Pulley Co. v. Scholfield
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Motion in the Supreme Court of Errors for permission to file a written application for an order vacating an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court in New London County (Gfeorge W. Wheeler, J.), and for a release of the stay of execution thereon.
Read the full summary
Motion in the Supreme Court of Errors for permission to file a written application for an order vacating an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court in New London County (Gfeorge W. Wheeler, J.), and for a release of the stay of execution thereon. The motion was presented to this court while holding its April term in the third judicial district, together with the application which leave was asked to file; and a rule upon the adverse party to show cause against granting the motion was issued by order of the court, returnable at a later day of the term. The application was verified by…
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
General Statutes, § 1111, provides that all courts shall “ cause the facts on which they found their final judgments and decrees to appear on the record; and such finding, if requested by any party, shall specially set forth such facts.” This was one of the innovations of the Practice Act of 1879; the former statute, for which this was substituted, only directing that “ courts of equity shall cause the facts on which they found their decrees to appear on the record.” Stat. Bev. of 1875, p. 444, § 10. Under the first of the Buies of Court for making up records of judgments under the Practice…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. DuffySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bulkeley's AppealSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- In Re Application of Title Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Corbett v. MatzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Nowsky v. SiedleckiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Dibble v. WolffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.