Legal Opinion

Kashman v. Parsons

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 21, 1898PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Action in the nature of ejectment, brought to the City-Court of Hartford and tried to the jury before Morse, Recorder ; verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and appeal by the defendant for alleged errors of the court in its rulings upon evidence. The following facts appeared from the finding: In 1895 the plaintiff brought a former action of ejectment against the defendant in the same court, respecting the same land.

Read the full summary

Action in the nature of ejectment, brought to the City-Court of Hartford and tried to the jury before Morse, Recorder ; verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and appeal by the defendant for alleged errors of the court in its rulings upon evidence. The following facts appeared from the finding: In 1895 the plaintiff brought a former action of ejectment against the defendant in the same court, respecting the same land. The parcel in controversy was situated in Hartford, and was a narrow, triangular piece, running to a point on Main street. To that action a general denial was pleaded, and a…

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

The cross-complaint in the first action of ejectment was based upon a claim of a mutual mistake. It set up that neither party supposed at the time that the land *302bargained for included the triangular parcel now in dispute, or that the deed embraced it in its terms of description. These allegations were put in issue, and the issues found for the present plaintiff.

In the present action the defendant’s second defense is rested on estoppel, and in its support she pleads that she claimed this parcel as hers at the time of the conveyance, which the plaintiff well knew, and that all she sold him was…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Coughlin v. McElroySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  2. De Watteville v. SimsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Corbett v. MatzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  4. Brennan v. Berlin Iron Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  5. In re Premier Cycle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API