Dauenhauer v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.
Heretofore, petitioner filed an action in the respondent court, entitled “Florian F. Dauenhauer, plaintiff v. W. F. Barber and Betty L. DeVoto, . . . defendants,” seeking to recover defaulted cash rentals on a hop-picking machine, damages for other breaches of the lease, and repossession of the machine. Defendants Barber filed their answer, and W. E. Barber filed a cross-complaint. Plaintiff’s demurrers to answer and cross-complaint were sustained with leave to amend. Amended pleadings were filed, and the court by order extended the plaintiff’s time to plead to the pleadings as amended. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hopson v. North American Ins. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1951
- Allen v. HatchettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- State Ex Rel. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co. v. Boone Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
- Crofton v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
3Cited by12 opinions
- Goodenough v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Grand Lake Drive In, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Cotton v. Federal Land BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Laguna Village, Inc. v. Laborers' International Union of North AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Oaktree Capital Management, L.P. v. BernardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.