Legal Opinion

Adams v. Adams

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 2015No. 20140259PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Sandra Adams appeals from an amended supplemental judgment dividing the marital estate between her and John Adams. On appeal, Sandra Adams argues the district court’s property division was not equitable, because the court erred in not applying discounts to the values of properties awarded to her. She also argues the court erred in applying a two percent interest rate to a payment from John Adams equalizing the court’s property division. We affirm.

I

[¶2] Sandra Adams and John Adams were married in 1971. John Adams sued her for divorce in 2011. The district court entered…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Buchholz v. BuchholzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Fox v. FoxNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Hoverson v. HoversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Fisher v. FisherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Hoverson v. HoversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Innis-Smith v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Rebel v. RebelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Weigel v. WeigelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Holm v. HolmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Estate of JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API