Legal Opinion
Fisher v. Fisher
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 23, 1996No. Civil 950410PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
David Fisher, Suzanne Medley, and Mi-cheál Fisher appeal from a district court order denying their motion to intervene in their parents’ divorce action under Rule 24(a), N.D.R.Civ.P. We affirm.
David, Suzanne, and Micheál are adult children of Gene and Sheila Fisher. Gene filed for a divorce from Sheila in June 1994. The major asset of the marriage is ownership of stock in Fisher Industries (Fisher), a close corporation encompassing Fisher Sand & Gravel, General Steel and Supply, and Greenacres Farm. Fisher is a multimillion dollar corporation that employs hundreds of people,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,083 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Flight Transportation Corporation, FTC Executive Air Charter, Inc., FTC Cayman, Ltd., and William Rubin, Greyhound Leasing & Financial Corporation, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Flight Transportation Corporation, FTC Executive Air Charter, Inc., FTC Cayman, Ltd., and William Rubin, Joyce RubinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Schumacher v. SchumacherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Sierra Club v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Balvik v. SylvesterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Brandt v. SomervilleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Wald v. WaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Marriage of GonzalezUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Loll v. LollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Fisher v. FisherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.