Holm v. Holm

VandeWalle, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Dianna Holm appealed from a judgment granting her a divorce from Thomas Holm and dividing their marital property. We conclude the district court’s treatment as compensation of dividends received from stock purchased from Thom*494as Holm’s employer, and the court’s valuation and award of the stock, are not clearly erroneous. We affirm the judgment.

I

[¶ 2] The parties were divorced in June 2016 after a 24-year marriage. One of the parties’ major assets was stock they purchased from Thomas Holm’s employer which amounted to a ten percent ownership interest in the…