Rebel v. Rebel

■ VANDEWALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Helen Rebel appealed from an amended divorce judgment entered after remand distributing the parties’ marital property. We conclude the district court adequately explained its disparity in dis*259tributing the parties’ marital property and the distribution is not clearly erroneous. We further conclude the court did not abuse its discretion in awarding interest on Rodney Rebel’s delayed cash payments to Helen Rebel. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Helen and Rodney Rebel were married in 1989 and owned a farming and ranching operation. In 2010, Helen Rebel sued for divorce. They…