Mayer v. City of Amery
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.
Wausau Insurance Company and the City of Amery (Wausau) appeal the trial court's judgment holding that the Wausau policy provided Mark Meyer with uninsured motorist (UM) coverage and, as a result, Wausau was responsible for a pro rata share of Meyer's damages. Wausau argues that the trial court erred when it construed Wausau's policy as providing Meyer coverage. We conclude that the policy unambiguously provides that the City is the named insured. Further, to construe the policy as providing coverage to Meyer as a named insured would lead to an unreasonable result, and would extend the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cunningham v. Insurance Company of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
- Sproles v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Germanotta v. National Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Insurance Co. of North America v. PerrySupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
- In RE MARRIAGE OF LEVY v. LevyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Whirlpool Corp. v. ZiebertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Edwin Kennedy v. National Juvenile Detention Association and Illinois Juvenile Justice CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Mau v. North Dakota Insurance Reserve FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Zarder Ex Rel. Menard v. Humana InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Greene Ex Rel. Schoone v. General Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.