Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Board of Com'rs of Osage County v. Prentice

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 18, 1938No. 28312PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

The trial court granted the writ of mandamus to compel the board of county commissioners to take appropriate action in the matter of requesting a supplemental appropriation of the excise board for the payment of publication fees for printing the notice of sale of real property for delinquent taxes pursuant to section 12741, O. S. 1931, 68 Okla. St. Ann. sec. 382, and from that judgment the board has appealed.

The essential facts are that soon after the beginning of the fiscal year involved, the board made their estimate, and request for appropriation of $709 for this purpose, and in due time…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Protest of Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. Gulf Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Board of County Comr's v. Western Bank & Office Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. State Ex Rel. St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. BoyettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Union School District No. 1. v. Foster Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Western Paint Chemical Co. v. Board of Cty. Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Clackamas County, Ore. v. McKayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  2. Clay v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Smith v. Board of County Com'rs of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  4. Clackamas County v. MckayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  5. Board of Com'rs of Pontotoc County v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API