Legal Opinion

Hochberg v. O'Donnell's Restaurant, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 27, 1971No. 5322PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALLAGHER, Associate Judge:

This is an appeal from a directed verdict in favor of the defendant at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case in an action for damage to a tooth caused in chewing an olive which had been in a martini cocktail purchased in defendant’s restaurant. The complaint alleged a cause of action against O’Donnell’s Restaurant for negligence and breach of implied warranty. The restaurant brought a third-party action against Hale Friedenberg, t/a My-Own Food Products, from whom the restaurant had purchased the olive. The latter in turn filed a fourth-party action for indemnity…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mix v. Ingersoll Candy Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Bonenberger v. Pittsburgh Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Betehia v. Cape Cod Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Silva v. F. W. Woolworth Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Cushing v. RodmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Ex Parte Morrison's Cafeteria of Montgomery, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Hoyte v. Yum! Brands, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. Phillips v. Town of West SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. Williams v. Braum Ice Cream Stores, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API