Legal Opinion

Williams v. Braum Ice Cream Stores, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 24, 1975No. 47140PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant brought this action against defendant-appellee for breach of implied warranty of merchantability. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment was granted. Plaintiff appeals from that ruling.

The trial court held that a cherry seed or pit found in ice cream made of natural red cherry halves was a substance natural to such ice cream, and as a matter of law defendant was not liable for injuries resulting from such a natural substance.

The uncontroverted facts in the case show that plaintiff purchased a “cherry pecan” ice cream cone from defendant’s retail store in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mix v. Ingersoll Candy Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Zabner v. Howard Johnson's, IncorporatedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  3. Bonenberger v. Pittsburgh Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Betehia v. Cape Cod Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Silva v. F. W. Woolworth Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Phillips v. Town of West SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. O'Dell v. DeJean's Packing Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978
  4. Jeffries v. Clark's Restaurant Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  5. Yong Cha Hong v. Marriott Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API