Williams v. Braum Ice Cream Stores, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant brought this action against defendant-appellee for breach of implied warranty of merchantability. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment was granted. Plaintiff appeals from that ruling.
The trial court held that a cherry seed or pit found in ice cream made of natural red cherry halves was a substance natural to such ice cream, and as a matter of law defendant was not liable for injuries resulting from such a natural substance.
The uncontroverted facts in the case show that plaintiff purchased a “cherry pecan” ice cream cone from defendant’s retail store in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mix v. Ingersoll Candy Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Zabner v. Howard Johnson's, IncorporatedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Bonenberger v. Pittsburgh Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Betehia v. Cape Cod Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Silva v. F. W. Woolworth Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Phillips v. Town of West SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- O'Dell v. DeJean's Packing Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978
- Jeffries v. Clark's Restaurant Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Yong Cha Hong v. Marriott Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.