Legal Opinion
United States v. Fischbach and Moore, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 22, 1983No. Crim. 83-98PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHILL, District Judge.
The defendants in this case were indicted by a federal grand jury and charged with criminal violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. The government allegations charge defendants with conspiracy and bid rigging in connection with electrical contracting work done for United States Steel at its “Western Pennsylvania Works” from 1974 to 1981. 1 Specifically, the government claims that defendants formed a continuing agreement by which they allocated electrical construction projects among themselves, fixed the prices at which these projects were bid,…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Mobile Materials, Inc. And Gerald O. PhilpotCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. VastolaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
- United States v. DerrickCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. EisenbergDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- United States v. Omni International Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.