Legal Opinion

United States v. Mobile Materials, Inc. And Gerald O. Philpot

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 22, 1989No. 86-1756PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Per curiam

This ease arose as one of several prosecutions in a campaign by the Justice Department to rid the Oklahoma and Kansas highway construction industry of anticom-petitive bidding practices. In view of the issues on appeal, it will be helpful to recite the procedural history of the case in some detail.

On August 22, 1984, a grand jury sitting in the Western District of Oklahoma returned a seven-count indictment against Mobile Materials, Inc. (the Corporation), Mobile Materials Company (the Partnership), and Gerald 0. Philpot, the president of both firms. Count one of the indictment charged all…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Bloate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. United States v. Sammy G. Daily and Frederik A. FiggeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Larry M. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. Syncom Capital Corp. v. WadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. PaulinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API