Legal Opinion

Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 18, 1954PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tunnell,

Justice, for the court: Only the highlights of this litigation will be reviewed here, for it is fully reported in three opinions of this court and two opinions of the' Court of Chancery. 32 Del.Ch. 231, 83 A.2d 595; 32 Del.Ch. 231, 90 A.2d 660; 33 Del.Ch. 82, 91 A.2d 57; 33 Del.Ch. 177, 92 A.2d 594 ; 33 Del.Ch. 283, 99 A.2d 507.

This was a derivative action seeking to enjoin issuance of a series of incentive stock options to defendant’s key executive personnel. The Chancellor gave summary judgment in favor of defendant. Subsequent appeal to this court established that it had been error…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  3. Maurer v. International Re-Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1953
  4. Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  5. Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chrysler Corporation v. DannSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
  2. Sugarland Industries, Inc. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  3. Science Accessories Corp. v. Summagraphics Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  4. Allied Artists Pictures Corp. v. BaronSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  5. McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. PalleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API