Legal Opinion

Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided October 8, 1951PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Chancellor:

This is an action by a minority stockholder seeking to enjoin a restricted stock option plan adopted by the defendant corporation with the approval of a majority of stockholders. Plaintiff seeks also to have declared invalid an amendment to the certificate of incorporation divesting the stockholders of pre-emptive rights with respect to certain stock.

*233At a directors’ meeting held March 14, 1951 the defendant’s board of directors adopted a restricted stock option plan subject to ratification by the stockholders at the forthcoming annual meeting.

The board of directors at the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Keller v. Wilson Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1936
  2. Rosenthal v. Burry Biscuit Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1948
  3. Morris v. American Public Utilities CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
  4. Kingston v. Home Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1917
  5. Albrecht, Maguire & Co. v. General Plastics, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Fidanque v. American Maracaibo Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
  3. B & H Warehouse, Inc. v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1954
  5. Thatcher v. Jerry O'Mahony, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API