Legal Opinion
Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided November 14, 1952No. 4, A. D. 1952PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Tunnell, Justice,
delivering the opinion of the court:
This cause comes on for decision following re-argument. The opinion up for reconsideration is reported supra, p. 82, 90 A.2d 660. Reference to supra, p. 177, 91 A.2d 57, 60, will disclose that defendant was granted this re-argument for the limited purpose of showing, if it could, that the conclusions heretofore announced by the court were in contravention of the terms of Para. 2046, Revised Code of Delaware 1935.
In connection with the re-argument, however, plaintiff has urged that this statute which was assigned as the subject of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moulor v. American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Rogers v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Cheever v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Kerbs v. California Eastern Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bennett v. Breuil Petroleum Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
- Bennett v. Breuil Petroleum Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
- Spirt v. BechtelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Gamble v. Penn Valley Crude Oil Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1954
- In Re Anderson, Clayton Shareholders Lit.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.